Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Gonzalez v. Los Heat.TV, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Alberto Gonzalez
Defendant:
Los Heat.TV, LLC, Diana Montes Ramirez, Diana Montes-Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Noel et al v. Cronan et al
as 1:2023cv12299
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel, Arnold G Noel, Jr., Bartley M. Noel and others
Defendant:
Paul M Cronan, Barthine Romelus, Brailey Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Aguiar v. Garland
as 23-1265
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ALBERTO DO MONTE AGUIAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Noel v. Hawaiian Telecom et al
as 1:2022cv11423
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Hawaiian Telecom, Eric K Yeaman, Steven Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
US v. Montes
as 22-1402
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MONTES, a/k/a Jose Rivera, a/k/a Tuto
Carlson et al v. Homeowners Association of Villas de Monte y Mar et al
as 3:2021cv01475
Defendant:
Maria Julia Romero Rosado, Homeowners Association of Villas de Monte y Mar, MARIJULIA ROMERO ROSADO and others
Plaintiff:
Meghan Carlson, Hannah Carlson, Mary Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb et al v. La Rosa del Monte Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01138
Defendant:
Bekins Moving Solutions, Compass International Forwarding, Inc. and La Rosa del Monte Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sofia Peirats-Moore, Mathew B. Cobb, Sofia G. Peirats-Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
