Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Reed Jr. v. Dennis et al
as 1:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Reed Jr.
Defendant:
Health Care Providers Foundations, Fancy, Christina Wick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lange v. McLaughlin
as 1:2020cv03210
Defendant:
George E. McLaughlin
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Dena Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aspen v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Dena Aspen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fucci et al v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Samson, Maxon-Multiline, EC9 Holdings and others
Defendant:
J&J Cubit Construction, Christopher J. Ashby, Kate Jensen and others
Tso v. Murray, et al
as 19-1352
Defendant / Appellee:
KILLIS RIDINGS & VANAU PC, RICHARD F. SPIEGLE, Individually Psy. D., CYNTHIA COFFMAN, official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT T. TSO
Royston v. Christian et al
as 6:2019cv00274
Defendant:
Kristi Toombs, Steve Nabors, Roy Prentice and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Royston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tso v. Murray, et al
as 19-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD F. SPIEGLE, Individually Psy. D., CYNTHIA COFFMAN, official capacity, COLORADO DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT T. TSO, a natural person and an American
Alexander v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 2:2019cv00509
Plaintiff:
Carla Alexander
Defendant:
Dena Kirkpatrick and Teri George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
St. Amant et al v. Carlson et al
as 1:2019cv00923
Defendant:
Emmi Carlson, Kenneth Lindblad, Dena Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda St. Amant, Rhonda (I) St. Amant, Christopher St. Amant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tso v. Murray et al
as 1:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Rebecca Murray, Ross B.H. Buchanan, Russell Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert T. Tso
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
