Cases 171 - 180 of 832,217
Markos v. Summit Publishing, LLC
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Steven LaMont Markos
Defendant:
Summit Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rodriguez-Macedo v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Rodriguez-Macedo
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Strasburg v. Chief Riggleman, Moorefield Police
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
William Strasburg
Defendant:
Chief Riggleman, Moorefield Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tolar v. Bug Tussel Wireless LLC
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Tomika Tolar
Defendant:
Bug Tussel Wireless LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Krause v. Lily Hospice LLC
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Klarissa Krause
Defendant:
Lily Hospice LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VMD SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
VMD SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, LLC doing business as VMD CORP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Vertigo Vapor v. FDA
as 24-60332
Petitioner:
Vertigo Vapor, L.L.C., doing business as Baton Vapor and Max & Zach's Vapor Shops Incorporated
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
Rainbow Energy Center, LLC v. EPA, et al
as 24-1226
Petitioner:
Rainbow Energy Center, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
