Cases 91 - 100 of 830,165
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.D. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02774
Plaintiff:
J.D.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.F. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02777
Plaintiff:
M.F.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.H. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
D.H.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeCapua v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Victor DeCapua
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
N.W. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
N.W.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.B. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
C.B.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
