Cases 1 - 10 of 70
George v. Schofield et al
as 5:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Romancee Oshay George
Defendant:
Robert Schofield, FNU Kitchen, James Pappas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv03454
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morrell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schofield v. Schaffer et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Schofield
Defendant:
Scotty Schaffer and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schofield v. Schaffer et al
as 6:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne Schofield
Respondent:
Cpt. Scotty Schaffer and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Schofield et al
as 5:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Romancee Oshay George
Defendant:
Robert Schofield, James Pappas, FNU Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schofield v. Givens et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schofield v. Givens et al
as 6:2021cv00048
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Givens and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHOFIELD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
PRESTON LEONARD CHOFIELD and PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. State of Georgia
as 1:2020cv01083
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Petitioner:
Jamaal Rasheen Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THIGPEN v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00176
Defendant:
Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, LOUIS SCHOFIELD, ROBYN BARROW and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE THIGPEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
