Cases 141 - 150 of 831,479
In re Eyewear Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2024cv04826
Plaintiff:
Michelle Morgan, Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and others
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica SA, Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Minhas et al
as 1:2024cv04488
Plaintiff:
Kulwant Kaur Minhas, Sumeet Minhas, Preet Minhas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mordini v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Robert Mordini
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ballard v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Ballard
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Tyrone S. Evans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Neal v. Sheriff of Canadian County et al
as 5:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Laura Neal
Defendant:
Sheriff of Canadian County, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Ave Giovinco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WMK, LLC v. Mobility Works, LLC
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
WMK, LLC an Ohio Limited Liability Company doing business as MobilityWorks
Defendant:
Mobility Works, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Alaniz v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Idalia Alaniz
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Alto Dynamics, LLC v. Fresha.com SV Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Alto Dynamics, LLC
Defendant:
Fresha.com SV Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
