Cases 91 - 100 of 2,202
Perez v. Aspiro Tires LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Yandi Perez
Defendant:
ASPIRO TIRES LLC and OMAR ASPIRO
Other:
Emmett Lamar Battles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Christopher Tipton v. Centurion, et al
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR TIPTON
Defendant:
CENTURION and UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brinson v. Burnsville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lamar Brinson
Defendant:
Burnsville Police Department, Joseph Williamson, Steven Stoler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Demontaye Jones
as 24-10198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMONTAYE LAMAR JONES
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Steven Blackmon and Tyrone Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
