Cases 11 - 20 of 1,319
Williams v. Knox et al
as 7:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Aline H Williams
Defendant:
Jessie Knox, Deb Knox, Franderick Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
H. v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Andres DeMendoza H.
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritter v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ritter, Raymond Mitchell Keeton, Courtney Morgan and others
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Odom v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Eric Vernardo Odom
Defendant:
Ben H. Brooks and Jeffery Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
