Cases 11 - 20 of 864
Thomas v. Jordan et al
as 6:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Todd Jermane Thomas
Defendant:
J. Jordan, K. Whiting, Dr. Gilete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glen Spivey v. Leonard Schiofman, et al
as 23-12091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C. E. RICHARDSON and others
Seaman v. Fleurjean et al
as 8:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Seaman
Defendant:
Marc Fleurjean, Jonathan Morales, Christopher Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lozano v. Corizen Health Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lozano
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc, Yes Care Inc., Charlotte County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hensley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Hensley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Wilcotte Rahming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Chapman v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 23-11132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CHAPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, RUTH NAGLICH, MARY COOKS and others
Kinner v. Perkins et al
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Mark Perkins, Bernard Reed, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blutcher v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jaylen L. Blutcher
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nida v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv14030
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Nida
Defendant:
Martin and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Theopholus H. Jordan
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
