Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Shelby v. Lynn et al
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jeffry K. Shelby
Defendant:
Jonathan Lynn, Robert Andy Jones, Shane Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12466
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARROLL JONES and ROBERT CARROLL JONES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07012
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOUIS JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Cole et al
as 6:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Eddie Cole, Ofc. Robert L. Jones, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery Wooden v. The Town of Eatonville, et al
as 22-10649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY WOODEN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TOWN OF EATONVILLE, ROY SMITH, Individually, ROBERT L. JONES, Individually and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01595
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Jones II and ROBERT RAY JONES, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruffin v. Jones
as 3:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ruffin
Defendant:
Robert Luther Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
