Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Robinson v. Thorton (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
CO Thorton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First Chicago Insurance Company v. Freeman et al
as 8:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
First Chicago Insurance Company
Defendant:
Janet Freeman, Nyah Vernae Thorton and Kimberly Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00155
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, DORM OFFICER SMITH, DORM OFFICER MANN and others
Plaintiff:
EDGAR J MARTIN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07884
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY THORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joyner v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00825
Defendant:
Officer Marshanna Henck, Florida Department Of Corrections, Lt. Derrick Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner v. Thorton
as 3:2019cv01337
Defendant:
Officer J. Thorton
Plaintiff:
Kevin Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUTCHLEY v. HERRON et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Captain THORTON, Counselor BYRD, Deputy Warden of Sec HERRON and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Thorton et al
as 3:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
Kentarkius Jamel Morgan
Defendant:
Sgt. Deloach, Lt. Dimaurio, Officer Pope-Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odim v. Thorton et al
as 1:2019cv00862
Defendant:
Charles Mack and Christopher Thorton
Plaintiff:
Torri Odim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2018cv00469
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, WARDEN FORD and others
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN, FENTON DRUMMA WEBB, MOBB SHIT MONSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
