Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Paulk et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 5:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gerald Paulk, Yancy Tyler Roper, John Sanderson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Crafton v. Ford et al
as 4:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Colleen Crafton
Defendant:
Dr. Yancy Ford, Lynn Anderson, F. Lamar Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
YANCY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48533
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE CORNELIUS YANCY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANCY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47921
Plaintiff:
RANDY YANCY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yancy v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Yancy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
YANCY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21340
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAGNUS YANCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANCY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16665
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA EDWARD YANCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMPTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06055
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
YANCY JOVON HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
