Cases 31 - 40 of 395
Justin Laster v. City of Atlanta, et al
as 22-13639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA, KEISHA LANCE BOTTOMS, FELICIA MOORE and others
Davis v. Telfair County et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Davis
Defendant:
Telfair County, Edwin Neal, Annie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOONE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21007
Plaintiff:
DEMOND BOONE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boone's Pharmacy Inc. v. EzriRx LLC
as 2:2022cv00375
Counter Defendant:
Boone's Pharmacy Inc.
Defendant:
EzriRx LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bailey et al v. Town of Fort Deposit, Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00532
Defendant:
Keith Bailey, Shenika Bailey, Town of Fort Deposit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Boone et al
as 3:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Decord Stewart
Defendant:
London M. Boone, J. Selph, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2022mc00011
Plaintiff:
Bradford Boone and Christy Boone
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Not Classified By Court:
Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.
BOONE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14989
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESTON BOONE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Willie Boone
as 22-12557
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIE JAMES BOONE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
JME Building And Development, LLC v v. The City of Fairhope, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JME Building And Development, LLC v
Defendant:
The City of Fairhope, Alabama, The City Council of The City of Fairhope, Alabama, Jimmy Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
