Cases 31 - 40 of 247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amerisure Insurance Company et al v. Amason & Associates Inc et al
as 7:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amason & Associates Inc, Core Tuscaloosa 519-611 Red Drew LLC, Core Campus LLC d/b/a Core Spaces and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dawson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Megan Dawson
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Nancy Buckner, Stephanie Glisppe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Collins-Burke Funeral Home Inc.
as 6:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Jared Bailey
Defendant:
Collins-Burke Funeral Home Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Shelton et al
as 5:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
James O Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Kristy Diana Shelton, Steven Jeffrey Shaw, Claude E Handley, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Captain Tuck, Chief Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
