Cases 51 - 60 of 3,864
KING v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE KING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, US TREASURY, TUWANDA F WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ritter v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ritter, Raymond Mitchell Keeton, Courtney Morgan and others
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Charles v. Raymond Building Supply, LLC
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jouselie Jean Charles
Defendant:
Raymond Building Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Diamond v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Raymond Diamond
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Raymond Strong v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10320
Petitioner:
RAYMOND L. STRONG
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Raymond Parkman v. State of California, et al
as 24-10299
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GRANT PARKMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
