Cases 51 - 60 of 3,654
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry SmithIn re: Henry Smith
as 24-10456
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent:
MARY B. WINDOM, JENNIFER M. HOWELL, DONALD MCMILLIAN and others
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
Earnest Files, Jr.In re: Earnest Files, Jr.
as 24-10364
Petitioner:
In re: EARNEST J. FILES, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: Dwight Lampkin
as 24-10352
Petitioner:
In re: DWIGHT DION LAMPKIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Brown v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dangelo Laquez Brown
Defendant:
Pfizer Pharmaceutical, Pathway Group Home, Journey Group Home Growth Develop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Henry v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, et al
as 24-10139
Plaintiff:
BRUCE HENRY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, SHERIFF OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA
Kennedy Minnifield v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-10083
Petitioner:
KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Respondent:
LIMESTONE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
