Cases 71 - 80 of 117
ESPEJO-DAVILA v. TRUMP et al
as 4:2020cv01593
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Chad Wolf and others
Petitioner:
JEAN CARLO ESPEJO-DAVILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERGROSSI v. TRUMP
as 1:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERGROSSI v. TRUMP
as 1:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERGROSSI v. TRUMP
as 1:2020cv00182
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv22722
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Attorney General William P. Barr, DONALD J TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADEJUSTE v. TRUMP
as 3:2020cv05604
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, ALLENDER, MARK INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00607
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Ashley Moody, Lt. Tremble and others
Plaintiff:
Mervin Gale Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. AT & T
as 1:2020cv02229
Defendant:
Republic Service, Wilson Carolyn Family, United States Secret Service and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Buchanan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Inspector General of the Florida Department of Corrections, Ronnie Fussell, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman and Ernest Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELAZQUEZ QUINONEZ v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 9:2020cv80528
Plaintiff:
Luis VELAZQUEZ QUINONEZ and Luis Velasquez Quinonez
Defendant:
Field Office Dir. Michael W. Meade, Attorney General William Barr, Henry Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
