Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Spears v. Meeks et al
as 2:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Shane Spears
Defendant:
Dennis F. Meeks, Millard Henry McWhorter, III, A. Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRECTV, Inc v. McWhorter et al
as 2:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc
Defendant:
Roger McWhorter and The Sports Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Feagin v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Feagin
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Willard McWhorter, Annette Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv20722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lowrey v. Barrow County
as 2:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Lowrey
Defendant:
Barrow County, McWhorter, Correct Health and others
McWhorter v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Tony McWhorter
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
McWhorter et al
as 1:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
William C McWhorter and William C McWhorter
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
McWhorter v. Ward
as 6:2009cv01314
Plaintiff:
Richard W. McWhorter, Richard W. McWhorter, Richard W. McWhorter and others
Defendant:
J. Robert Ward, J. Robert Ward and J. Robert Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Lowrey v. Barrow County et al
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Lowrey
Defendant:
Barrow County, Wrap Restraint Co, Correct Health Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
