Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Richardson v. Weaver et al
as 6:2023cv02409
Plaintiff:
Jaleer S. Richardson
Defendant:
Sergeant B T. Weaver, Correctional Officer S. Aviles, Correctional Officer D Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
B T et al v. MARSTILLER
as 4:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
B T and AG
Defendant:
SIMONE MARSTILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caplan v. B&T AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR LLC et al
as 0:2022cv60625
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
B&T AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as Sunshine Auto Center and DAIMLER INVESTMENTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Prosser et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Prosser, Brooke Prosser, Fred Rush and others
Defendant:
B. T. Roberts, Clark Sahlie, James W. Rane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Trulove
as 1:2019mi00178
Plaintiff:
Little G. Stone
Defendant:
Lt. B. T. Trulove
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Pippen v. Harris et al
as 5:2015cv02162
Plaintiff:
Harold James Pippen
Defendant:
James Earl Harris and B&T Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almonte v. B&T Automotive Repair, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv62150
Plaintiff:
Jorge Almonte
Defendant:
B&T Automotive Repair, LLC and Christopher Jochim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Big Eye Tuna & Swords, LLC et al v. Jenny G. LLC. et al
as 9:2015cv81226
Plaintiff:
Big Eye Tuna & Swords, LLC and B&T Swordfish, LLC
Defendant:
Jenny G. LLC. and Guillermo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
