Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13505
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90530
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77700
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77702
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2017cv00474
Plaintiff:
David Potter
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Walter Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Potter v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00749
Plaintiff:
David Potter
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Police Chief of Dothan, Alabama , Officer Treynhm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
