Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apex Bank v. Child First 24 Hour Childcare
as 1:2017cv00985
Plaintiff:
Apex Bank
Defendant:
Child First 24 Hour Childcare
Movant:
Dianne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Janet Dianne Williams and Donald S. Williams
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv02839
Plaintiff:
Janet Dianne Williams and Donald Williams
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheridon v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00475
Plaintiff:
Darius Sheridan
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Dianne Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Blue et al.
as 2:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Bonny Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Henry P. Hughes, Dianne Williams, Jean Brown and others
Petitioner:
Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edson v. McRae et al
as 0:2014cv62594
Plaintiff:
Steven August Edson
Defendant:
Victoria P. McRae, Jeannette G. Moran, Ernest Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 7:2014cv01841
Plaintiff:
Dianne Williams
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bettis v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00881
Plaintiff:
Ronnie James Bettis
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Dianne Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Meeks, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00439
Plaintiff:
William Bailey
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Dr. McWatters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
