Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hickmon v. FBI Director et al
as 6:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Levory Hickmon
Defendant:
FBI Director and FBI Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddis v. Giddens et al
as 1:2021cv00501
Defendant:
United States Attorney, FBI Director, Sylacauga Police Chief and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NeGuerian Wright v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 21-10830
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JANE DOE, FBI DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEGUERIAN SIMONE WRIGHT
GRAY v. BUSH et al
as 4:2020cv00171
Defendant:
SONNY PERDUE, SAM NUNN, PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwane Walker v. Eric Holder, et al
as 20-11477
Defendant / Appellee:
LEON PANETTA, Former CIA Director, ROBERT S. MUELLER, Former FBI Director and ERIC HOLDER, Former US Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWANE LASALLE WALKER
Shannon Copeland v. FBI Director, et al
as 20-11444
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, RON DESANTIS, Governor, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, FDLE Commissioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON COPELAND
Shannon Copeland v. Phinney, et al
as 19-14310
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DAWSON, Jail Employee Liberty County Jail, NICK FINCH, Liberty County Sheriff, RICHARD SWEARMEJON, FDLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON COPELAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Thomas Bush v. President of the United States, et al
as 18-12923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS K. BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FBI DIRECTOR and others
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61965
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
