Cases 1 - 10 of 121
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Sr. v. Kaushal et al
as 8:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Terance J Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Alash Kaushal and PTL Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Navado Jones v. Attorney General, State of Georgia
as 24-11028
Petitioner:
NAVADO J. JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Jones v. Kaushal et al
as 8:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Terence J. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Alash Kaushal and PTL Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jones v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2023cv01506
Plaintiff:
Tommie J Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Retic v. Captain John Hutton et al
as 5:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Anthony Retic
Defendant:
Captain John Hutton and Lieutenant Michael J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Bernard Pierson
Defendant:
J. Jones, C. Welch, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Tullis et al
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Lt. C. Tullis, Swinford, G. Bardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Securus et al
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Securus and DW J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Brandley et al
as 4:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
Unit Manager G. Brandley, Lt. Christopher Tulls and J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
