Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Elbert Walker, Jr. v. Dismas Charities, Inc., et al
as 22-13847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELBERT WALKER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., CAROL OATES and KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Ward v. Johnson
as 3:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael Ward
Defendant:
Lieutenant Kimberly Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. DISMAS CHARITIES INC et al
as 5:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES INC, CAROL OATES and KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58001
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92630
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87072
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv59987
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05501
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Cobb et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00632
Defendant:
Correctional Williams, Correctional Washington, Kimberly Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Correctional Brunson, S. Caldwin, Kimberly Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
