Cases 1 - 10 of 16
George Sanders, Jr. v. Joseph Headley, et al
as 23-10831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE J. SANDERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, A. MURPHEY and others
MURPHEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14101
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MURPHEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91036
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HARRISON MURPHEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00793
Defendant:
A. Murphey, M. Lanier, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
George J. Sanders, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01760
Plaintiff:
JACOB MURPHEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANN v. HEATH
as 7:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALAN MANN, JR
Defendant:
ANTHONY HEATH, JEREMY MARQUEZ, KYLE LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphey v. Cruse
as 2:2014cv14211
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Murphey
Defendant:
Rebecca Cruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Branch v. 1715 Northside Drive, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00960
Counter Claimant:
1715 Northside Drive, Inc., Carmen Popovitch and A-1 Entertainment, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Ashlie L. Branch
Defendant:
C. B. Jones, II, C. B. Jones, Karen Caudle and others
Petitioner:
Dean R. Fuchs and Susan Kastan Murphey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Stephen Agnone , Enzo Agnone , Douglas Porcelli and others
Defendant:
Camden County, Georgia , Willis R. Keene, Jr. , Jimmy Starline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCNEIL v. MORGAN et al.
as 3:2013cv00495
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MCNEIL
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN, WHITLOCK, REUBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
