Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sales v. Smith et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gerber Sales
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer Whittley, Officer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Dunlap et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Officer Dunlap, Officer Whittley and Officer Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Sgt. Mason et al
as 5:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Michael Javar Harris
Defendant:
Sgt. Mason, Sgt. Fourty, Officer Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
LaEric Shamir Avery
Defendant:
Officer Wilson and Officer Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques v. Hill et al
as 1:2021cv21648
Defendant:
Espino, Guttini, Officer Girobey and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
McLendon v. Teodoro et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center, Officer Barner, Officer Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Drew Barry McLendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Lieutenant WAKEFIELD, Sergeant WRIGHT, Sergeant THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Lieutenant WAKEFIELD, Sergeant WRIGHT, Sergeant THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eubanks v. Boggs et al
as 1:2019cv02944
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Eubanks
Defendant:
Officer Keith Nichols, Officer Robert Howell, Officer Adam Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Smith
Defendant:
Lieutenant Hawkins, Sergeant Milsap, Jr., Sergeant Doorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
