Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Russell County Department of Human Resources et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Megan Dawson and Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Russell County Department of Human Resources, Alabama Attorney General Office, Greg Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jervis Brown v. Russell County Sheriff, et al
as 23-10094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERVIS JERMAINE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSSELL COUNTY SHERIFF and MICHAEL SCHROEDER, Sgt.
Dunn v. Russell County Jail (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Dunn
Defendant:
Russell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wombles v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Michael Wombles
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
