Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Archible v. Upton et al
as 1:2023cv01840
Petitioner:
Hakim-Amali Archible
Respondent:
Stephen Upton and Wheeler Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Danforth et al
as 7:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Larry Oliver Jenkins
Defendant:
William Danforth, Orr, Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jai Lee v. Stephen Upton
as 10-15772
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN UPTON
Tharpe (DEATH PENALTY) v. Upton
as 5:2010cv00433
Petitioner:
Keith Tharpe (DEATH PENALTY)
Respondent:
Stephen Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mapp v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Al Rico Mapp
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joe Burnette, Stephen Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhode (Death Penalty) v. Upton
as 5:2010cv00349
Petitioner:
Brandon Rhode
Respondent:
Stephen Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhode v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv03037
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rhode
Defendant:
Brian Owens , Stephen Upton and Other Unknown Employees and Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Harris v. Stephen Upton
as 10-12705
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN RENARD HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN UPTON
Alonzo Morefield, Jr. v. Larry Brewton, et al
as 10-11665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO MOREFIELD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BREWTON, Unit Manager, Individually and in Official Capacity, WARDEN STEPHEN UPTON, Individually and in Official Capacity, JOHN PAUL, Deputy Warden, Individually and in Official Capacity and others
Alonzo Morefield, Jr. v. Larry Brewton, et al
as 10-11511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO MOREFIELD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BREWTON, Unit Manager, Individually and in Official Capacity, WARDEN STEPHEN UPTON, Individually and in Official Capacity, JOHN PAUL, Deputy Warden, Individually and in Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
