Cases 1 - 10 of 946
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morin v. Alliance TSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
Nicklas Morin
Defendant:
Alliance TSP, Inc., Stacey Eaton and Carlos Rodriguez
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMEYER v. GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
STACEY LAMEYER
Defendant:
GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pitts
Defendant:
Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Hendricks et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Omar Diaz, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristin K. Hendricks, John O'Connor, Erin Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Bains et al
as 1:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Smith and Nickeil Bethea-Smith
Defendant:
Stacey Bains, Kara Padgett, Amanda Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David v. Hydrick et al
as 1:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Judge Stacey K. Hydrick, P.D. Scott W. DePlonty, Judge Courtney L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Bank of America
as 1:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Stacey Price
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
