Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) Cases filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina matching "S"
Cases 1 - 10 of 831,895
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03915
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05490
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Terrell et al v. The Ensign Group, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00724
Plaintiff: Michelle S. Terrell and Margaret Ozuna
Defendant: The Ensign Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03922
Plaintiff: S. M.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22493
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Staffney v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11678
Plaintiff: Harold Staffney
Defendant: Heidi E. Washington, Robert A. Benson, David G. Kamm and others
MTD Investments, Inc. v. Jantan et al
as 2:2024cv05518
Plaintiff: MTD Investments, Inc.
Defendant: Abdul Mukti Bin Jantan and Aidah Binti Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Rogne v. City of Catoosa
as 4:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: John Rogne
Defendant: City of Catoosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
JEFFRIES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Plaintiff: BRIGITTA JEFFRIES
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CROSS v. SHERIFF et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ELIAS JACOB CROSS
Defendant: SHERIFF and A. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?