Cases 21 - 30 of 460,458
Packard v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05557
Plaintiff:
Nadine Packard
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen - Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Ewing v. USA
as 4:2024cv00907
Petitioner:
David K. Ewing, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chaudhry v. LivaNova USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
Katherine Chaudhry
Defendant:
LivaNova USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gilbert-Brown v. USA
as 1:2024cv01087
Petitioner:
Anthony Gilbert-Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Rufino Robelo-Galo
as 24-12128
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUFINO ROBELO-GALO
Valcic v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05576
Plaintiff:
Latifah Raoof Valcic
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05579
Plaintiff:
Monica Williams
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05570
Plaintiff:
Deborah Williams
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Loreal USA Inc, Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frazer v. USA
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
