Cases 11 - 20 of 51
M.M.M et al v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv01759
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DANIEL A. BIBLE and others
Plaintiff:
L.C.O., I.A.T., G.C.H. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACINTO-CASTANON DE NOLASCO et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01536
Plaintiff:
ALMA ZULI JACINTO-CASTANON DE NOLASCO , T.J.N.-J. and D.E.N.-J.
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
GUST v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv01143
Defendant:
BOB VOGEL, JESSIE K. LIU, UNITED STATES DEPT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BRISENO MEDINA v. SESSIONS
as 1:2018cv00995
Petitioner:
HECTOR VICENTE BRISENO MEDINA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PILKIN et al v. SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02501
Plaintiff:
VITALY EVGENIEVICH PILKIN and VLADIMIR VITALYEVICH MIROSHNICHENKO
Defendant:
SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC, SONY CORPORATION, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
