Cases 61 - 70 of 831,211
RCA Laboratory Services, LLC v. The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
RCA Laboratory Services, LLC doing business as Genetworx
Defendant:
The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Digital Access LLC v. R K City Food Mart INC et al
as 2:2024cv11619
Plaintiff:
Digital Access LLC
Defendant:
R K City Food Mart Inc., Athena Bitcoin Inc. and Rawel Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burnett v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
William Burnett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024bk20281
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024bk10810
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ATECHGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
ATECHGOV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Moss v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv01144
Petitioner:
Clovis Costell Moss, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PATTERSON v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
TRACY PATTERSON
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
