Cases 91 - 100 of 418
Wang v. Quiros
as 23-235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lishan Wang
Defendant / Appellee:
Marie Charles, Nurse/NA of MacDougall CI and Harmon, Correctional Officer (CO), MacDougall CI
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, DOC Commissioner, Nick Rodriguez, District Administrator, Rollin Cook, Former DOC Commissioner and others
Jordan v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Washington, McKnish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Noel Rivera
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Long, Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Quiro et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
Angel Quiro, Long, Pac McCrystal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Quiro et al
as 3:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Edgar Torres
Defendant:
Angel Quiro and Danielle Masek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jusino v. Reis et al
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Jusino
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Nick Rodrigues, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennyman v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01552
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pennyman
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Oles, Ortyl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Hunter
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Commissioner of D.O.C., Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Bryant Wilson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Robledo and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman, III
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
