Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Bey v. Nassau County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency
as 2:2021cv06172
Plaintiff:
Violet Burrowes Bey
Defendant:
Nassau County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burrows v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
SueAnn Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harrington v. County of Broome et al
as 3:2020cv01514
Defendant:
Addiction Center of Broome County, Inc., David Harder, County of Broome and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Adams et al. v. Deva Concepts, LLC
as 1:2020cv09717
Defendant:
Deva Concepts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Crystal Adams, Terrilyn Hunter, Kelly Rephann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Riley v. Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union et al
as 5:2020cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Riley
Defendant:
David W. Baker, Beth Carter, Bill Yates and others
Not Classified By Court:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dekom v. Fannie Mae
as 19-3425
Defendant / Appellee:
Laurence Chirch, Pawns 1-100, 2nd Department Appellate Judges and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Martin Dekom, and on behalf of the Little People
Johnson v. Mulligan et al
as 3:2019cv01297
Defendant:
Rivera, Peaches Hall, Seller and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
In Re: Martin Dekom
as 18-1971
Petitioner:
Martin Dekom, and on behalf of the Little People
Respondent:
Fannie Mae, Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Elisabetta Coschignano and others
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
