Cases 31 - 40 of 78
In re: Farxiga (Dapagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02776
Defendant:
Farxiga (Dapagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation, Astrazeneca AB, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Denzil Martin, Racheal Blois, June Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Ruffin v. Travers-Marsh et al
as 1:2017cv02564
Plaintiff:
Lee A. Ruffin
Defendant:
Donna Travers-Marsh, "Jane Doe" Furman, Tammi Chaboty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strujan v. Glencord Building Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00629
Defendant:
Gistizia Agressivo, Richard Babinecz, Brian Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gilmore v. Crossett et al
as 9:2016cv01300
Plaintiff:
Furman Gilmore
Defendant:
Lance Crossett, William Fitzmaurice, Gregory Overholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Merante et al
as 9:2016cv01299
Plaintiff:
Furman Gilmore
Defendant:
T. Merante, May, Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strujan v. Fiden & Norris, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv04365
Defendant:
Giustizia Agressivo, Amazon Pharmacy Inc., American Online Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gilmore v. Carey et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Furman Gilmore
Defendant:
Joseph Carey, Shania Yannonie, Andy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv04274
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
