Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Hall v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv02308
Defendant:
C.O. Does, Warden Clement Glenn, Medical Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
University Health, Inc. et al v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Halifax Regional Medical Center Employees' Pension Plan, Phoenix Health Care Management Services, Inc., Southeast Georgia Health System, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Allianz SE, Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC and Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Prokos v. Sleep Medical Associates PLLC et al
as 1:2020cv06207
Defendant:
Sleep Medical Associates PLLC and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Andrew Prokos
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Murphy Medical Associates, LLC et al v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2020cv01675
Plaintiff:
Steven A.R. Murphy, Diagnostic and Medical Specialists of Greenwich, LLC, Murphy Medical Associates, LLC and others
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bagnall v. Becerra
as 20-1642
Intervenor:
Jessie Ruschmann, Representitive of the Estate of Frederick Ruschmann, Louis Dziadzia, Loretta Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, George Renshaw, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Mary Smith, Representative of the Estate of Martha Leyanna and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Sarah Mulcahy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellee:
Brenda Hardy, Executrix of the Estate of Loretta Jackson and Michael Holt, Executor of the Estate of Charles Holt
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, AARP Foundation, National Disability Rights Network and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Make the Road New York et al v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2019cv07993
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Make the Road New York and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Public Health Association, Congressional Tri-Caucus, American Academy of Nursing and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Asian Americans Advancing Justice/Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund/National Women's Law Center, Economic Progress Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
