Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Smith v. Cahill
as 19-1490
Defendant:
M. Ojida, Nurse Administrator, in her individual capacity, M. Priti, Medical Physician, in her individual capacity, Dr. G. Cahill, Medical Physician, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas E. Smith
Webb v. Frayne et al
as 3:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Jason Cahill, Karen Jarmoc, Catherine A. Osten and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J.A. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cahill et al
as 9:2019cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith
Defendant:
M. Priti, Dr. G. Cahill, "Doe" Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeClair v. Vinson et al
as 1:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Doe 1, Jessica Vinson, County of Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas LeClair and Minors I.L. and S.L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arichabala et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12350
Plaintiff:
Denise Clark, Daniel Castoro, Hector Cardenas and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Alraimouny et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11862
Plaintiff:
Angelo Pernicone, Kathleen Pollak, Robert Maguire and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Bouattoura et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11772
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Bullette, James Bruno, Virginia Canady and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv09269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04563
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Cahill, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
