Cases 41 - 50 of 161
Roman v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak et al
as 3:2019cv01661
Plaintiff:
Taylor Roman
Defendant:
John Doe and National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lawrence v. Agramonte et al
as 3:2019cv01498
Plaintiff:
Shabash Lawrence
Defendant:
Agramonte, Russel W Taylor, S. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Nesto et al
as 3:2019cv01466
Defendant:
Eric Eisenhard, Kyle Listro, City of New Haven and others
Plaintiff:
Rashea King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Kors, LLC v. C.G.C. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01364
Defendant:
Richard Lebov, Digsby, Taylor & Hobbes, LLC, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. McDougall CC et al
as 3:2019cv01355
Defendant:
Legal Mail Recipients, McDougall CC, CCI Mental Health and others
Plaintiff:
Precell Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connecticut Joint Bargaining Council et al v. Connecticut Transit et al
as 3:2019cv01254
Plaintiff:
Calvin Henry, Albert Antonio, Alfred Barnes and others
Defendant:
H.N.S. Management Company, Inc. and Connecticut Transit
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Richards v. Morris et al
as 3:2019cv00902
Defendant:
Tyler Schulz, Phillip Ciccone, Richard Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Mi Rancho, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00862
Plaintiff:
Brooke Johnson, Brenda Lynn Geiger, Rosa Acosta and others
Defendant:
Kelvin J Riveria Ortiz, Mi Rancho, LLC and Mi Rancho, LLC doing business as Lambada
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
