Cases 1 - 10 of 3,234
Bell v. Astru
as 24-339
Plaintiff:
SHARON-SHAWN A. BELL
Defendant:
M. ASTRU, current, SSA Hdqts Comm., LINDA DORM, Boston MA Comm. Rgl 1, PATRICK NIGGERD, Caseworker, (ne'gard) - FO #31 and others
Bell v. Astru et al
as 3:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Sharon-Shawn A. Bell
Defendant:
M. Astru, Linda Dorm, Patrick Niggerd and others
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vazquez v. Standford
as 19-2945
Defendant / Appellee:
Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner (SSI), Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, or other acting in their official capacity, David Stukowy, Commissioner of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Vazquez
Vazquez v. Astrue et al
as 5:2018cv01492
Defendant:
James Rescue Mission Personnel, Parole NYS, David Stukowy and others
Plaintiff:
Jose P. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Standford et al
as 1:2018cv01071
Defendant:
Samuel D. Roberts, Tina Standford, David Stukowy and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Astrue
as 2:2016cv06537
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garner v. Astrue
as 1:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
Robin Lynn Garner
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Astrue
as 6:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
David K Miller
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Badillo v. Astrue
as 1:2015cv03388
Plaintiff:
Samuel Badillo, JR
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Retmanski v. Astrue
as 2:2014cv05640
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
James Retmanski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
