Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Lavanga v. Avantax, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09159
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lavanga
Defendant:
Avantax, Inc., Georganne Proctor, Mark Ernst and others
Jacobs v. Ernst & Young Investment Advisers LLP et al
as 1:2023cv08481
Plaintiff:
Mykle Jacobs
Defendant:
Ernst & Young Investment Advisors LLP, Bank of America Corporation and Ernst & Young Investment Advisers LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Carrasco v. Griffin
as 23-611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose E. Carrasco
Defendant / Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin
Defendant:
Comm. A. Annucci, Lt. W. Plimley, C.O. M. Ernst and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A Civil Action to Protect Against Retaliation in Fraud Cases
Rajkarnikar v. Ernst & Young et al
as 3:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
Ernst & Young, Charles and Carmine Di Sibio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tenemille v. Town of Ramapo
as 22-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ernst Theodore Tenemille and Ernst Tenemille
Defendant / Appellee:
Town of Ramapo, Christopher St. Lawrence, Ex-Town Supervisor, Patrick Withers, Councilman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
