Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lifschitz v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07481
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifschitz
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martin W. Edwards, R. Kent McGaughy, Jr. and others
McFeely et. al. v. The United States of America
as 2:2021cv05137
Plaintiff:
William McLellan, The United States of America c/o The Office of General Counsel and Janice McFeely
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Doe v. McLellan
as 2:2020cv05997
Defendant:
Cameron McLellan and Myron Cameron McLellan
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brady v. Friedlander
as 20-3715
Defendant / Appellee:
Kenneth Andrew McLellan, Esq., The Law Firm of Mark S. Friedlander, Keith R.M. Roussel, Esq. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James H. Brady
Brady v. Friedlander
as 20-3515
Defendant / Appellee:
Kenneth Andrew McLellan, Esq., The Law Firm of Mark S. Friedlander, Keith R.M. Roussel, Esq. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James H. Brady
Brady v. Friedlander et al
as 1:2019cv10622
Defendant:
Kenneth A. McLellan, Esq., Winget, Spadafora, Schwartz, LLP, The Law Firm of Mark S. Friedlander and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLellan v. The Travelers Companies, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
harold m mclellan and Harold M. McLellan
Defendant:
Travelers Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Harkins et al
as 3:2018cv01717
Defendant:
Nathan Soucy, Helen McLellan and Gregg Harkins
Plaintiff:
Bryant Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Nathan et al
as 3:2018cv01680
Plaintiff:
Bryant Wilson
Defendant:
Greg Harkins, Soucy Nathan and McLellan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Tran et al
as 3:2018cv01661
Defendant:
Thai N. Tran, Forensic Science Examiner I, Nelen McLellan and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
