Cases 1 - 10 of 1,713
Thomas Connelly, Jr. v. Warden Berks County Prison, et al
as 24-2099
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN BERKS COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
JOHNSON v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2024cv06910
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, P. REX, MARIO VIERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Jennings et al
as 1:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Attorney General Kathleen Jennings, Craig A. Karsnitz, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and ROSS P. BUSCEMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUERWINE v. HOLIHAN et al
as 5:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SAUERWINE
Defendant:
GAVIN P. HOLIHAN and RICHARD COBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
