Cases 171 - 180 of 1,080
Avas Sales Lead Services, Inc. v. John or Jane Doe
as 1:2021cv01005
Plaintiff:
Avas Sales Lead Services, Inc. doing business as Avas Flowers
Defendant:
John or Jane Done
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARD HENRY v. FOX NEWS NETWORK, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv13167
Plaintiff:
Edward Henry
Defendant:
SUZANNE SCOTT and FOX NEWS NETWORK, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
DEPACO v. COFINA MEDIA, SA et al
as 3:2021cv14409
Plaintiff:
CAESAR DEPACO
Defendant:
COFINA MEDIA, SA, REVISTA SABADO, ALEXANDRE JOSE RIBIERO MALHADO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEPACO v. SIC NOTICIAS et al
as 3:2021cv14402
Plaintiff:
CAESAR DEPACO
Defendant:
SIC NOTICIAS, SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICACAO, IMPRESA SOCIEDADE GESTORA DE PARTICIPACOES SOCIAIS, SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gurmessa v. Genocide Prevention in Ethiopa Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00869
Defendant:
Senait Senay, Genocide Prevention in Ethiopa Inc, Biniam Hirut Debabe and others
Plaintiff:
Tolessa Gurmessa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEW SEROTA v. JANOSIK et al
as 2:2021cv00684
Defendant:
ELEANOR JANE CHECK, MICHAEL JANOSIK, DONNA FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SEROTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEROTA v. NEWELL et al
as 2:2021cv00686
Defendant:
ROSE LEPRI, DOMENIC MEDINA, CATHERINE NEWELL and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SEROTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wabote v. Ude
as 5:2021cv02214
Plaintiff:
Simbi Kesiyi Wabote
Defendant:
Jackson Ude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIFEMD, INC. et al v. LAMARCO et al
as 2:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
LIFEMD, INC., STEFAN GALLUPPI and JUSTIN SCHREIBER
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10, CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO and CULPER RESEARCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIRSCH v. ADLER et al
as 3:2021cv12686
Defendant:
AMBER ADLER and HESHY TISCHLER
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT M. HIRSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
