Cases 31 - 40 of 11,533
DOE v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MILLER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Sheena Robinson
Defendant:
Officer John Rhodes, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
John Fink v. Jonathan Bishop, et al
as 24-1581
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. FINK
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. BISHOP, KAYDON A. STANZIONE, JOSEPH M. TROUPE, JR. and others
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SHAH v. TURNER III et al
as 3:2024cv05988
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DHARIA v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05915
Plaintiff:
RAJESH DHARIA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, FBI, DAVID HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jemma Hussey, et al v. Pennington School, et al
as 24-1862
Plaintiff:
JEMMA BREANNA HUSSEY and JEANNA ELZABETH HUSSEY
Defendant:
THE PENNINGTON SCHOOL, HEADMASTER WILLIAM S. HAWKEY, BOARD CHAIRMAN PETER TUCCI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
