Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Lockett v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Lt. Ngduea, Sgt. Slayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett and Ty
Defendant:
Robert May, Shafer, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00014
Petitioner:
JOHN N. LOCKETT, III
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOCKETT v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv01636
Petitioner:
TRAMALE LOCKETT
Respondent:
RICHARD C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockett v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv01843
Plaintiff:
Tramale Lockett
Defendant:
Delker, Woods, Kimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. Tuttle
as 3:2015cv01018
Petitioner:
Tramale Lockett
Respondent:
John Tuttle and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOCKETT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv01196
Petitioner:
MOSES B LOCKETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ROBERT BUECHELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MADISON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MADISON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MELVIN LOCKETT, CYNTHIA L. DAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James Turner v. Harry Nicoletti, et al
as 13-4826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY NICOLETTI, individually and as an employee of SCI-Pgh, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MELVIN S. LOCKETT, individually and as Superintendent of SCI- Pgh and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
TORY KELLY, individually and as an employee of SCI-Pgh
LOCKETT v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv06298
Plaintiff:
ARMOND A. LOCKETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
