Cases 91 - 100 of 366
LARA et al v. EVANCHICK
as 2:2020cv01582
Plaintiff:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., LOGAN D. MILLER, SOPHIA KNEPLEY and others
Defendant:
COL. ROBERT EVANCHICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehta v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Jonathan Christodoro, Hiroshi Mikitani, Logan Green and others
Plaintiff:
Vishal Mehta
Nominal Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
LOGAN v. MILLSTONE MANOR LLC et al
as 3:2020cv14433
Defendant:
JAMESBURG MANOR LLC, JOHN DOES 6-10, VISIONS 2013 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POWELL v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2020cv05400
Defendant:
DR. DONNA LEONE, NURSE/DR. GAYE, DEPUTY WARDEN BEAUFORE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINKSTON v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2020cv01435
Plaintiff:
DESIREE PINKSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, JOHN DOE, OFFICER MORGAN J. LOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF LOGAN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JUSTIN HOLLERN, TYLER MCCONNELL, NICOLE GRIPP and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HARRIS v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2020cv03745
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., STEVE MILLER, DR. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
LOGAN TYRELL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDERICK LOGAN COMPANY, INC. v. R.C.E. HEAT EXCHANGERS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00736
Defendant:
ROBERT STROBEL, JR., MICHAEL E. EARL and R.C.E. HEAT EXCHANGERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK LOGAN COMPANY, INC.
Counter Claimant:
R.C.E. INDUSTRIAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
