Cases 111 - 120 of 17,776
TALBERT v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant:
DO MARY HOWICK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02558
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
TAMI SMITH and EDWARD SKIBINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d)(5)(B) Diversity of Citizenship under CAFA
Smith
as 3:2024cv06920
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06864
Defendant:
WARDEN ORTIZ and C/O SMITH
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Defendant:
DAVID G. SMITH, COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON, PENNSYLVANIA, CHRISTOPHER B. WENCKER and others
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, LAEL BROWN, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Correction and others
ACKER et al v. UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
as 2:2024cv02468
Plaintiff:
AIDEN ANKLI, GRAHAM COOK, MIRANDA KRAMER and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d)(5)(B) Diversity of Citizenship under CAFA
SMITH v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2024cv02520
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, RNS, CALIGURI, M. SAVAGE, ARNS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 24-2020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMEIA O. SMITH, a/k/a Omar, a/k/a D
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
