Cases 11 - 20 of 30,377
NGUYEN v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Administrator WILLIAM H NGUYEN
Defendant:
CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WILLIAMS v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
TALEYIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
WILLIAMS v. P.A. PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv02669
Petitioner:
TYRICK WILLIAMS
Respondent:
P.A. PAROLE BOARD, J. RIVELLO, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bouza v. FCI-Allenwood-Medium
as 4:2024cv00998
Petitioner:
William T. Bouza
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Plaintiff:
CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, DAMON J. NOTO, MD, SPINE & JOINT CENTER and others
KOSTROUN v. EXCEL PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C.
as 2:2024cv07020
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KOSTROUN
Defendant:
EXCEL PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
FOREMAN v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
WILLIAM FOREMAN
Respondent:
M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. CONTINUUM HEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv07014
Plaintiff:
LORETTA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CONTINUUM HEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC and CONSENSUS HEALTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SHELTON v. GRANT et al
as 3:2024cv06993
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. SHELTON
Defendant:
BRENNA GRANT, JOHN CARRIGG and JOHN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
