Cases 11 - 20 of 23
BLACKSTONE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2016cv08600
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, ASHLEY STARK, SHERRI LILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szubielski v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00984
Plaintiff:
Gerard Szubielski
Defendant:
David Pierce, David Parker, Jeffrey Carothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. West
Defendant:
Pierce, Scarboro, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Adams County Domestic Relations et al
as 1:2014cv02074
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Adams County Domestic Relations, William Gold, Susan Gantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAROTHERS v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY - NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
as 3:2014cv03433
Plaintiff:
LINDA CAROTHERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY - NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
West v. Emig et al
as 1:2013cv02103
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. West
Defendant:
Mark Emig and Jeffrey Carothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HATAB et al
as 2:2009cv03030
Plaintiff:
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MARGARET O. HATAB and SARA CAROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
WALKER v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
PAULETTE WALKER
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF JOHNSTOWN PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICER ROBERT CAROTHERS, BADGE #270 and CITY OF JOHNSTOWN PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
